Diet

In our minds strengthened the idea that short-term limitation in the amount of food or skewed in favor of some of some products (mono-diet) or the restriction of some kind of macronutrients (eg carbohydrates in the Atkins diet, "Kremlevka"), you can achieve real and sustainable results in weight loss. This is mildly not so. If the results were fixed, then would not need to invent more than 28,000 diets, it would suffice to 3 - 5 for every taste and color.

But the fact is that after a "successful" completion of a person's diet comes back to "normal" diet, and with it returns to its "normal weight" - that an adequate diet. Moreover, the weight comes back he is a "captive leads." And what do we do? Correctly. Looking for a new, tougher, better diet, the effects of which will be even more sad. And so until pereprobuem everything and everyone, or do not start to draw eyes on proper nutrition. We deliberately avoid the word "balanced diet" because The notion of balance for each sufficiently subjective. More appropriate word "adequate", ie appropriate to your age, sex, physical activity and the goals that you would like to achieve.

It is obvious that losing weight a person should eat right, but not as much as it does someone who just supports the weight or, conversely, increasing muscle. And all in a row to impose a "balanced diet" is the wrong approach. Besides the figures of the balance of proteins, fats and carbohydrates for some reason, all different.